Book Bans

Audio reading

Audio reading by Polly on Amazon Web Services

White House · State Politics · Law and Courts · United States · politics

The Trump administration and Republican state governments have undertaken a comprehensive, multi-front effort to censor and control media—including broadcast, online, and print, with dramatic impacts on local and national levels. These actions span executive orders, lawsuits, legislative efforts, regulatory pressure, funding restrictions, the weaponization of federal agencies, and broad campaigns targeting books and classroom speech. Here is a thorough narrative report, rich with real incidents and direct quotes, to illustrate the scale and ramifications of these efforts.

Executive Orders and Federal Actions

Trump’s return to the White House in January 2025 was marked by his signing of Executive Order 14149, “Restoring Freedom of Speech and Ending Federal Censorship.” Despite its title, the order signaled intense scrutiny of past governmental communications, especially those related to social media platforms accused of limiting conservative views. The order states:

“No Federal department, agency, entity, officer, employee, or agent may act or use any Federal resources in a manner that would unconstitutionally abridge the free speech of any American citizen.”

Yet, actions taken under this order have in practice targeted perceived critics. The administration has particularly removed diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) language from federal websites after Trump declared DEI “immoral and illegal,” a move that sent a chilling effect through public institutions and academic publishing.

Key federal agencies, including the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), have been repurposed as instruments of pressure against media outlets deemed adversarial. Within days of Trump’s inauguration, the new FCC chairman reopened closed proceedings to investigate CBS based on claims the network edited a “60 Minutes” interview with Kamala Harris to make her look better, demanding unedited transcripts and camera feeds—a move that, as one analyst put it, “sets a troubling precedent for media outlets that have generally declined such access”.

The FCC further launched investigations into NPR and PBS, echoing repeated calls from Trump and allies like Rep. Marjorie Taylor-Greene to challenge the “bias” of public broadcasting. NPR’s CEO was summoned before Congress to answer accusations of bias.

“We’re bringing free speech back starting today,” Trump declared as he signed the order. “Oh, do I know about that, those creeps.”

But his vision of “free speech” has largely meant governmental retribution against opposition voices.

Defunding and Legislative Pressure on Public Media

One of the Trump administration’s first major acts was a sweeping executive order to cut funding from NPR and PBS, labelling them as “partisan and biased” and instructing the Corporation for Public Broadcasting to “cease direct funding.” The order said:

“The CPB Board shall cancel existing direct funding to the maximum extent allowed by law and shall decline to provide future funding.”

NPR and PBS responded by warning of a “devastating impact” on the millions of Americans who rely on their reporting, especially in rural areas where commercial news coverage is sparse and public broadcasters are “a lifeline in emergencies.”

← PreviousBook Bans · Page 1Next →