CUDA (Continued)

Artificial Intelligence · Labor · Business · tech

Huang stayed a moment longer, looking at the vacant chairs, as if measuring the distance between who these students were and who they must become.

Outside, the rain had stopped. The stones of Cambridge gleamed under a gray sky — the same stones that had outlasted plagues, wars, monarchs. They did not care about GPUs, or IQ, or whether intelligence was cheap this century. But as Huang stepped into the chilled air, the wind caught his jacket like a sail, and the scent of rain rose again — sharper now, almost metallic.

He closed his eyes briefly, aware of the weight of the future pressing on the present. Intelligence becoming water. Genius becoming tap pressure. Value moving somewhere else entirely.

He walked forward.

The rain smell followed him, then faded, leaving only cold air and breath. And for a moment — just a moment — the world felt like a question waiting for someone to answer it.

Some futures are won by talent — this one will be won by taste.

Biibliography

1. Financial Times, “Nvidia’s Jensen Huang on AI: ‘You Have to Use It,’” including: “It’s not likely that you’ll lose a job to AI. You’re going to lose the job to somebody who uses AI.”

2. MIT Technology Review summary of Cambridge remarks on poorly defined work.

3. TechRadar, “Nvidia CEO Says It’s ‘Insane’ Not to Use AI,” covering CUDA history and the non-pivot.

4. IMF/ILO/OECD synthesis on AI labor impacts and the hollowing-out of mid-skill cognitive work.

5. McKinsey Global Institute, “People, Agents, and Robots.”

6. Jakob Nielsen, Nielsen Norman Group critique of human negative-value decision making.

7. Cambridge University Q&A reported via Business Insider — Huang stating he would study physics if starting again.

← PreviousCUDA · Page 4Next →