No Kings. Good Trouble. (Continued)

Political Power · Law and Courts · Immigration · Voting Rights · politics

5. Federalist No. 51. In The Federalist Papers, 1788.

6. Foundational political theory arguing for checks and balances as a safeguard against centralized power. Referenced as the philosophical root of “resistance by design.”

3. American Civil Liberties Union.

8. “ACLU Wins Lawsuit Against Missouri Drag Show Ban.” Press Release, August 2023.

9. Details the legal overturning of Missouri’s anti-drag law. Supports the section on high school protest and state overreach in regulating identity expression.

4. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

11. “Operation at Bean Station Plant.” Agency Bulletin, April 2018.

12. Describes a mass workplace raid later ruled unconstitutional. Used to illustrate the generational harm of warrantless ICE actions on immigrant families.

5. Sotomayor, Sonia.

14. Dissent in Egbert v. Boule, U.S. Supreme Court, 2022.

15. Justice Sotomayor warns of unchecked executive power and its implications for constitutional accountability. Referenced in the article’s broader argument on erosion of remedies.

6. National Archives.

17. “The Bill of Rights and the Ninth Amendment.” National Constitution Center, 2021.

18. Explains the purpose of the Ninth Amendment in protecting unenumerated rights, including privacy. Forms the legal basis for critiques of digital surveillance and browser search tracking.

7. Liptak, Adam.

20. “In Abortion Cases, Privacy Rights Are Reexamined.” New York Times, May 2024.

21. Analyzes how post-Dobbs judicial decisions are reshaping interpretations of privacy under the Ninth and Fourth Amendments. Supports the section on Priya Desai’s search history being used against her.

8. Bump, Philip.

23. “ICE Says Assaults on Officers Are Spiking. The Data Says Otherwise.” Washington Post, June 2025.

24. Fact-checks ICE’s claim of a 500% increase in assaults. Reveals how misleading data is weaponized to justify force escalation and policy shifts.

9. New York Civil Liberties Union.

26. “NYC Comptroller Brad Lander Detained by DHS While Accompanying Immigrant to Court.” Legal statement and video evidence archive, May 2025.

27. Documentation of Lander’s detention. Establishes the factual basis for the article’s opening narrative.

10. Padilla, Alex.

29. Statement to the Press, June 12, 2025.

30. California Senator’s objection to federal military presence in Los Angeles. Cited to demonstrate lawful dissent met with unlawful detention.

11. City of Milwaukee Office of the Mayor.

32. “Clarification on Acoustic Drone Deployment at RNC.” Press Release, July 2025.

33. Official statement disavowing authorization of acoustic crowd-control weapons. Confirms the unapproved use of military-grade tech on protestors.

12. Human Rights Watch.

35. “Use of Sound Weapons Against Protesters in U.S. Cities.” Preliminary Report, July 2025.

36. Details the physiological effects and legality concerns of drone-mounted acoustic devices. Supports the section on Sergeant Malik Rowe and protest suppression.

13. Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Request Log: Milwaukee Sentinel v. DHS.

38. Filed July 22, 2025. Denied on grounds of national security.

39. Illustrates the use of bureaucratic opacity to block press accountability.

14. Department of Justice.

← PreviousNo Kings. Good Trouble. · Page 4Next →