In Bakersfield, DHS used a “voluntary service interview” notice to draw undocumented parents to a local office. Inside, the agents waited with cuffs⁷.
In Louisiana, advocates documented a dozen cases where migrants were summoned with appointment letters, only to be detained on arrival⁸.
The state didn’t shout. It requested.
“They arrested my father with a piece of paper,” said Salomon Buch, a survivor. *“The paper said come. So he came.”*⁹
That choreography—official paper masking official force—didn’t stay confined to Europe. It reappeared on American soil.
That method—using the appearance of normal process to stage removal—has recurred.
In 1954, the U.S. government launched Operation Wetback, sweeping up over a million people based solely on appearance and neighborhood¹⁰. Court records show families separated with no records, and U.S. citizens deported based on last names. At the time, there was no constitutional check—the operation predated Miranda and most modern due process.
In 2006, ICE began conducting workplace raids with sealed warrants, often citing “critical infrastructure” rules to bar legal observers¹¹. In one Georgia raid, 400 poultry workers were detained in a single shift. Nearly all were charged only with civil violations.
In 2025, the choreography continues: paper over presence, routine over rupture.
The Penske operation wasn’t a departure. It was a refinement.
DHS arrest quotas had tripled earlier that year¹². A new detention facility—nicknamed “Speedway”—opened in Indiana with 2,000 beds and no open intake logs. No legal aid groups were allowed inside during intake, and detainee names were redacted from ICE’s custody records for up to 72 hours—making timely legal intervention almost impossible¹³. “By the time we found them in the system, they’d already signed removal papers,” said Elena Torres, an immigration lawyer in Indianapolis. “Seventy-two hours might as well be a black site.”
Civil rights groups documented more than 30 mistaken detentions of U.S. citizens, including Peter Sean Brown, whose case reached federal court. The court ruled ICE had violated his Fourth Amendment rights¹⁴.
Still, the raids continued. Despite the ruling, federal agents kept coming—and immigrant rights groups began treating the parking lots not just as gathering places, but as legal frontlines, watching curbsides the way others watch courtrooms.