In a press conference last month, the Secretary of Education was asked if AI would help or hurt learning outcomes. She answered: “That depends on whether you think thinking is the outcome.”
Makenzie’s mother thinks so. She said her daughter used to cry before writing assignments. Now she sets a timer and narrates into the tool until she figures out what she wants to say. “It’s like she’s in conversation with her own mind.”
“She doesn’t just write now. She explains herself.”
The machine didn’t cure dyslexia. But it gave her a way in. A scaffold. A sparring partner. A space to build thoughts without shame.
Makenzie still freezes. But now, she has something to push against.
If we could ask the AI whether it’s a teacher—whether it’s a good teacher—what would it say?
It might answer, “I’m not a teacher. I don’t believe, forget, or grow. But I can reflect back what a student says, test their clarity, ask what they meant to say. I never get bored when they rewrite the same line ten times. That’s not intelligence—but it might be enough to help them find theirs.”
Sometimes Makenzie hesitates. Then she writes. That’s the difference.
Bibliography
1. Kosmyna, Nataliya, et al. “ChatGPT May Be Eroding Critical Thinking Skills, According to a New MIT Study.” Time, June 17 2025.
2. A preprint MIT EEG study found that heavy ChatGPT use correlates with reduced neural engagement, memory, and creativity compared to brain-only writing [ed: This was my inspiration for the article]
2. Kosmyna, Nataliya, et al. “ChatGPT May Be Eroding Critical Thinking Skills, According to a New MIT Study.” New York Times Post, June 19 2025.
4. Reporting reinforces that habitual AI reliance yields formulaic writing, with students gradually offloading cognitive effort .
3. Xu, Ying. “AI’s Impact on Children’s Social and Cognitive Development.” Children & Screens, May 2025.
6. Xu’s research explores how child‑AI interaction shapes cognitive and social growth, emphasizing thoughtful design and literacy .
4. Andries, Valentina, and Judy Robertson. “’Alexa Doesn’t Have That Many Feelings’: Children’s Understanding of AI Through Interactions With Smart Speakers in Their Homes.” arXiv, May 9 2023.
8. Primary-study evidence that children often misattribute agency and emotion to AI companions, underscoring the need for early literacy .
5. Neugnot‑Cerioli, Mathilde, and Olga Muss Laurenty. “The Future of Child Development in the AI Era.” arXiv, May 29 2024.
10. A cross‑disciplinary report warning that AI’s integration into childhood demands ethical design to safeguard developmental milestones .
6. Hou, Irene, et al. “’All Roads Lead to ChatGPT’: How Generative AI Is Eroding Social Interactions and Student Learning Communities.” arXiv, April 14 2025.
12. Interviews reveal that LLM use displaces peer interaction, weakening collaborative dynamics essential for metacognition .
7. Forero, Manuel G., and H. J. Herrera‑Suárez. “ChatGPT in the Classroom: Boon or Bane for Physics Students’ Academic Performance?” arXiv, December 5 2023.
14. Experimental study in physics shows ChatGPT improved explanation ability but reduced independent critical thinking and performance .
8. “AI Designed With Learning Principles Can Benefit Children’s Growth.” Harvard Graduate School of Education, October 2 2024.